did DHS watermark election ballots?! part of election fraud sting operation?

hedgehog

BAMF
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
5,585
Location
spain, in the sun, with a beer
Stacy abrahm was not running for president in a national election, nor did she get beaten by a larger margin than trump beat Clinton.

For people who laughed about liberals being snowflakes after Clinton lost, and laughed about drinking cocktails made with liberal tears, they sure do the same but better.

Clinton lost and trump won the electoral college by the same as trump lost to Biden by. He called it a shellacking and the will of the people. Clinton conceded 2 days later and the day after, Obama had trump at the White House to start the transition.

That is losing with dignity, and assuring the transfer goes smoothly to the benefit of the country, unlike what we now see.

The silence and complicity of the Republican Party in this disgraceful episode shows, as I said before, that the party is more important than the country.

It has become a cult.
 

GSXRTURBO1

BAMF+
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
10,871
Location
Southgate, MI
I'm in for $50.... its the least I can do since GA paid $100,000,000 for Dominion election machines.... and their peeps just FLED the COUP... GONE!
Ok, bet. So $50 with Qwik, $250 with BusaVeloce, $50 with r1racer. I've got Biden in all three bets, you guys have trump. Loser(s) donate to LABusas...The site can't lose.
 

Rocco

BAM
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
881
Of course it is....because it's a black, female democrat whining; therefore it's legit.

My bad.

I was listening to Abrams talk last week. She was asked if she would ever concede the election that was lost two years ago. Her reply was a flat never, because she felt the election was stolen and concession was not the correct response to theft.

-
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
4,989
Location
Texas
I was listening to Abrams talk last week. She was asked if she would ever concede the election that was lost two years ago. Her reply was a flat never, because she felt the election was stolen and concession was not the correct response to theft.

-
LOL she needs to learn to balance a checkbook among other things before trying to run a State LOL!
 
OP
r1racer

r1racer

BAMF
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Messages
1,095
Location
New Jersey
Ga. Had a hand recount...came up virtually the same as the machine.
hand count same fake ballots twice... they match... hooray, they paid $100M for this dominion garbage, heads gonna roll there.

meanwhile our amazing POTUS has been busy reorganizing SCOTUS districts.... this is really really good!
leading swing state roles go to Alito -PA (where they defied his rules to separate ballots), Thomas - GA, Kavanaugh - MI, ACB - Wisconsin! BRILLIANT move DT!!!

 

Vegas12

BAMF+
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
15,661
Stacy abrahm was not running for president in a national election, nor did she get beaten by a larger margin than trump beat Clinton.

For people who laughed about liberals being snowflakes after Clinton lost, and laughed about drinking cocktails made with liberal tears, they sure do the same but better.

Clinton lost and trump won the electoral college by the same as trump lost to Biden by. He called it a shellacking and the will of the people. Clinton conceded 2 days later and the day after, Obama had trump at the White House to start the transition.

That is losing with dignity, and assuring the transfer goes smoothly to the benefit of the country, unlike what we now see.

The silence and complicity of the Republican Party in this disgraceful episode shows, as I said before, that the party is more important than the country.

It has become a cult.

Yawn...

Yup....all the Republicans rolled up in the fetal position, seeking mental health, can't continue with work or school....yup, the dems are much more dignified...
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
4,701
Location
Cooter's trlr prk and hot wings
hand count same fake ballots twice... they match... hooray, they paid $100M for this dominion garbage, heads gonna roll there.

meanwhile our amazing POTUS has been busy reorganizing SCOTUS districts.... this is really really good!
leading swing state roles go to Alito -PA (where they defied his rules to separate ballots), Thomas - GA, Kavanaugh - MI, ACB - Wisconsin! BRILLIANT move DT!!!

The ballot count matches the registration count...
Trump is a useful idiot at best.
But wait you little slick motherfucker...stop trying to Donald Trump your way out of shit ...
1st, WHAT ABOUT THE WATERMARKS AND THE GOT DAMN STING?
2nd...What about the GOT DAMN BET?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
4,701
Location
Cooter's trlr prk and hot wings
Sounds made up, like everything else you claim is "evidence".
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CATEGORICALLY DENIES FALSE ASSERTIONS ABOUT VOTE SWITCHING AND SOFTWARE ISSUES WITH OUR VOTING SYSTEMS.
According to a Joint Statement by the federal government agency that oversees U.S. election security, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised." The government & private sector councils that support this mission called the 2020 election "the most secure in American history."
1) DOMINION IS NOT SHUTTERING ITS OFFICES. EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN ENCOURAGED TO WORK REMOTELY AND PROTECT THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA PROFILES DUE TO PERSISTENT HARASSMENT AND THREATS AGAINST PERSONAL SAFETY.
 

gobrian77

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Joined
Dec 31, 2001
Messages
23,488
Location
Thailand

C. Dolan

BAMF+
Joined
Dec 12, 2001
Messages
19,403
Location
San Diego, Ca.
The latest Trump team lawsuit in PA was just thrown out, with the judge saying, “This court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

.................. an Obama appointed, democrat judge: Big surprise, there.
 

gobrian77

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Joined
Dec 31, 2001
Messages
23,488
Location
Thailand
.................. an Obama appointed, democrat judge: Big surprise, there.
Obama-appointed (he apparently respected that Brann was recommended by both the Rep and Dem Senators from PA), yes, but, according to his bio in this article re: his nomination to PA District Court, not even close to being a Dem:

Brann, who is active in Republican politics in Pennsylvania, faced the most challenging questioning of the hourlong hearing at which five candidates for federal judgeships and a spot on the U.S. Sentencing Commission were considered.

Citing Brann's involvement with the state Republican Party, the National Rifle Association and the conservative legal organization the Federalist Society, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called him "probably the most Republican judicial nominee from the Obama White House."


The judge's political leaning doesn't preclude the case from being bullshit- sure, maybe it wasn't, but, if you look at how the other, similar cases have been faring, who appointed the judges doesn't seem to be making much difference.
 
OP
r1racer

r1racer

BAMF
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Messages
1,095
Location
New Jersey
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: FACTS & RUMORS
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CATEGORICALLY DENIES FALSE ASSERTIONS ABOUT VOTE SWITCHING AND SOFTWARE ISSUES WITH OUR VOTING SYSTEMS.
According to a Joint Statement by the federal government agency that oversees U.S. election security, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised." The government & private sector councils that support this mission called the 2020 election "the most secure in American history."
1) DOMINION IS NOT SHUTTERING ITS OFFICES. EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN ENCOURAGED TO WORK REMOTELY AND PROTECT THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA PROFILES DUE TO PERSISTENT HARASSMENT AND THREATS AGAINST PERSONAL SAFETY.
So if they're on the up and up why didn't they appear before the PA assembly?

Why have over 100 employees removed their LinkedIn accounts? Why aren't they going after Sidney and team for defamation? Answer: Dominion is riddled with fraud and foreign interference. The evidence will be overwhelming.
 
Last edited:

hedgehog

BAMF
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
5,585
Location
spain, in the sun, with a beer
Why have over 100 employees removed their LinkedIn accounts? Why aren't they going after Sidney and team for defamation? Answer: Dominion is riddled with fraud and foreign interference. The evidence will be overwhelming.
Because the employees were receiving death threats from angry trumpanzees, and which is why they are now working from home.

Seems they don’t want a repeat of something like when that RWNJ went into the pizza shop with an AR - a dangerous situation brought about by gullible idiots swallowing conspiracy theories with no basis in reality.
 

Rocco

BAM
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
881
How many times have we watched a sporting event turn around in the last minutes? How many times have you absolutely, positively believed an outcome, only to get shocked when it turned out to be the opposite? How many sure bets have been lost ? Expectations are not stronger than realities. Throwing caution to the wind on the unknown is a bad bet.

-

-
 

Squidwerd

Ze Squidwerd
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Messages
10,549
Location
Chattanooga Tn
Website
www.snoopdogg.com
The only way that happens with this election is by a coup, and if the Republican Party allows that to happen, it is the end of them as it would be a bridge too far.
Why do you say that? There was a time when the southerners wished to be left alone. The republicans literally marched us to the sea. We lost our cities our farms and our way of life.
Republicans are still here after that.
 

hedgehog

BAMF
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
5,585
Location
spain, in the sun, with a beer
Why do you say that? There was a time when the southerners wished to be left alone. The republicans literally marched us to the sea. We lost our cities our farms and our way of life.
Republicans are still here after that.
You have a point.

Republican voters will excuse the party anything, as long as it advances their agenda.

Shit! Look at the last 4 years!
 

GSXRTURBO1

BAMF+
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
10,871
Location
Southgate, MI
How many times have we watched a sporting event turn around in the last minutes? How many times have you absolutely, positively believed an outcome, only to get shocked when it turned out to be the opposite? How many sure bets have been lost ? Expectations are not stronger than realities. Throwing caution to the wind on the unknown is a bad bet.

-

-
The scores are always close enough to make that a possibility. This election isn't close enough...different ballgame altogether.
 

Rocco

BAM
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
881
The scores are always close enough to make that a possibility. This election isn't close enough...different ballgame altogether.


We don't know everything in play and neither do the news sources that are leading the public thinking. If you look into expert opinions and historical election outcomes in the past two hundred + years, it is entirely possible for the election to be thrown out and decided in the House. That is an outcome that favors trump. The ballots will mean nothing. The count will mean nothing. The selected electoral voters from the states will mean nothing. The Democratic majority in the house will mean nothing. If the contesting team succeeds in proving there was rigging via computers, the election is spoiled and the only correction this late in the game is plan B, the legislature. At this point we don't know what proof is in play from the contesting parties and that presents the possibility of a game changer. The news and everyone media wise is saying no, that will not happen, but they have an invested interest in maintaining their position. Until I hear both sides fully, I'm just hearing talk from propaganda professionals with a dog in the fight. Nope , there are still unknowns here and I know how that goes.

-
 
Last edited:

GSXRTURBO1

BAMF+
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
10,871
Location
Southgate, MI
We don't know everything in play and neither do the news sources the are leading the public thinking. If you look into expert opinions and historical election outcomes in the past two hundred + years, it is entirely possible for the election to be thrown out and decided in the House. That is an outcome that favors trump. The ballots will mean nothing. The count will mean nothing. The selected electoral voters from the states will mean nothing. The Democratic majority in the house will mean nothing. If the contesting team succeeds in proving there was rigging via computers, the election is spoiled and the only correction this late in the game is plan B, the legislature. At this point we don't know what proof is in play from the contesting parties and that presents the possibility of a game changer. The news and everyone media wise is saying no, that will not happen, but they have an invested interest in maintaining their position. Until I hear both sides fully, I'm just hearing talk from propaganda professionals with a dog in the fight. Nope , there are still unknowns here and I know how that goes.

-
then our constitution means nothing. The people have voted, making the choice clear. More clear than 2016. Now that it's the republicans that lost, we somehow turn to alternative means of figuring out this election. trump is trying to start a civil war, he hasn't a shred of decency within him.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
4,989
Location
Texas
then our constitution means nothing. The people have voted, making the choice clear. More clear than 2016. Now that it's the republicans that lost, we somehow turn to alternative means of figuring out this election. trump is trying to start a civil war, he hasn't a shred of decency within him.
Ahhh this is the typical Liberal Idiots way of thinking. It would be humorous if it was not so sad actually.
 

Rocco

BAM
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
881
then our constitution means nothing. The people have voted, making the choice clear. More clear than 2016. Now that it's the republicans that lost, we somehow turn to alternative means of figuring out this election. trump is trying to start a civil war, he hasn't a shred of decency within him.

It is all based on procedure and corrections made by the legislatures and not circumventing the constitution or the people. There are legal fixes based on many election problems over the past couple of centuries. If there is fraud, the American people were duped by the fraudsters not by any legislature following the law. The election was close enough that if large scale computer fraud is proved , it will probably also prove Biden didn't win anyway, so who's stealing what then ?

-
 

tinhead

Has never named a pet
Joined
Jan 1, 2002
Messages
33,644
Location
Northeast CT
Shyster Sidney-
"If anything I'm speculating on actually happened, it would warrant an investigation. There's no evidence that I'm spouting anything but fictional nonsense, however."
 

GSXRTURBO1

BAMF+
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
10,871
Location
Southgate, MI
It is all based on procedure and corrections made by the legislatures and not circumventing the constitution or the people. There are legal fixes based on many election problems over the past couple of centuries. If there is fraud, the American people were duped by the fraudsters not by any legislature following the law. The election was close enough that if large scale computer fraud is proved , it will probably also prove Biden didn't win anyway, so who's stealing what then ?

-
Zero fraud has been proven to date, not a single court case of many have succeeded in proving fraud occurred.
 

hedgehog

BAMF
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
5,585
Location
spain, in the sun, with a beer
you fucking cunt, it's fine for the liberal cunts, but you have an issue with the other way, you hypocritical foreign fucktard :fu:

46641

Clinton was beaten by the same margin of the electoral college (but won the popular vote by 3 million), with the electoral college loss being a total of 88,000 votes.

2days after the election she conceded, and the day after Obama had trump at the White House to start the transition.

Trump lost the electoral college by the same number, though by more actual votes, and lost the popular vote by 6 million, and has retreated into his bunker, is not speaking to the press, rage tweeting and obstructing the transition process as much as he can because he cannot accept he lost.

The only hypocrisy I see here is from a bunch of snowflake republicans who saw Clinton concede with dignity, but find the actions of their orange messiah acceptable even though he was soundly trounced by a bigger margin.

Get over it snowflake.
 
Last edited:

KEHALE

BAMF with a stick
Joined
Dec 29, 2001
Messages
1,421
Location
Utah
View attachment 46641

Clinton was beaten by the same margin of the electoral college (but won the popular vote by 3 million), with the electoral college loss being a total of 88,000 votes.

2days after the election she conceded, and the day after Obama had trump at the White House to start the transition.

Trump lost the electoral college by the same number, though by more actual votes, and lost the popular vote by 6 million, and has retreated into his bunker, is not speaking to the press, rage tweeting and obstructing the transition process as much as he can because he cannot accept he lost.

The only hypocrisy I see here is from a bunch of snowflake republicans who saw Clinton concede with dignity, but find the actions of their orange messiah acceptable even though he was soundly trounced by a bigger margin.

Get over it snowflake.
Clinton won California by over 4 million votes...
So, there’s that.

Maybe she should have run for governor of California.
 

KEHALE

BAMF with a stick
Joined
Dec 29, 2001
Messages
1,421
Location
Utah
Shyster Sidney-
"If anything I'm speculating on actually happened, it would warrant an investigation. There's no evidence that I'm spouting anything but fictional nonsense, however."
“I smell my own farts, eat crayons, and lick windows. Trump is Putin’s puppet!” -Wah N. Eyet
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
4,989
Location
Texas
Zero fraud has been proven to date, not a single court case of many have succeeded in proving fraud occurred.
I am actually starting to feel sorry for GSXRTURBO1. He is a very shallow thinker and accepts conclusions, readily, at face value. To illustrate earlier in this thread GSXRTURBO1 attempted to make a point about being Obvious, yes he was sincere, and despite being asked to explain just took another toke. Pity that the Liberal's and especially their base are for the most part weak minded.

"When someone is missing their face and a shotgun is lying beside them, you don't wait for the autopsy to know they died from a gunshot wound."

Now anyone who Has critical thinking skills would not have used this analogy. Because you are not able rationalize why your statement reflecting your legitimate belief a "autopsy" does not need to be performed to determine the FACTS! I will give a Hypothetical using your example.

Tinny is found missing his face with a shotgun next to him. However, in this Hypothetical case his friend Anal Disco went to visit him to make a purchase and found Tinny had expired from a drug OD (drowned in the toilet could not lift his head up long hair caught in the seat) in his motorhome! AD never letting a opportunity to get free dope moved him outside, let the shotgun do its work and left him there, taking his dope and cash. After all AD could not let poor Tinny who drowned in his toilet full of loose stools containing dinner from the night before be found like that and the dope and money go to the POPO! It would be a Scandal of monumental proportions with all of that cash, dope and poop! You see it was all for naught as the autopsy proved Tinny drowned in his own excrement because of the poop, water and corn found in his lungs from the toilet, not from a "gunshot wound" and AD has some "splainin" to do. :eek4:

Critical thinking skills are important..:biggrin:
 

GSXRTURBO1

BAMF+
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
10,871
Location
Southgate, MI
I am actually starting to feel sorry for GSXRTURBO1. He is a very shallow thinker and accepts conclusions, readily, at face value. To illustrate earlier in this thread GSXRTURBO1 attempted to make a point about being Obvious, yes he was sincere, and despite being asked to explain just took another toke. Pity that the Liberal's and especially their base are for the most part weak minded.

"When someone is missing their face and a shotgun is lying beside them, you don't wait for the autopsy to know they died from a gunshot wound."

Now anyone who Has critical thinking skills would not have used this analogy. Because you are not able rationalize why your statement reflecting your legitimate belief a "autopsy" does not need to be performed to determine the FACTS! I will give a Hypothetical using your example.

Tinny is found missing his face with a shotgun next to him. However, in this Hypothetical case his friend Anal Disco went to visit him to make a purchase and found Tinny had expired from a drug OD (drowned in the toilet could not lift his head up long hair caught in the seat) in his motorhome! AD never letting a opportunity to get free dope moved him outside, let the shotgun do its work and left him there, taking his dope and cash. After all AD could not let poor Tinny who drowned in his toilet full of loose stools containing dinner from the night before be found like that and the dope and money go to the POPO! It would be a Scandal of monumental proportions with all of that cash, dope and poop! You see it was all for naught as the autopsy proved Tinny drowned in his own excrement because of the poop, water and corn found in his lungs from the toilet, not from a "gunshot wound" and AD has some "splainin" to do. :eek4:

Critical thinking skills are important..:biggrin:
Jeezus you're an idjit :lol:
 

gobrian77

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Joined
Dec 31, 2001
Messages
23,488
Location
Thailand
Unless the Trump team presents a rational, coherent case that not only claims fraud but actually shows proof of it in a lower court, nothing is going to go to the SC. They can say whatever they want at press conferences or on OAN without a legal penalty, but court is a different story, and so far, when asked directly by the judge, his lawyers have said they aren't claiming voter fraud. If they had actual evidence to present, they would have presented by now as the clock is running out.

The SC doesn't hear cases that are laughed out of lower courts with admonishments by the judges re: lack of merit.

Even Chris Christie (no matter what you might think of him, he's a staunch Trump supporter who worked with him through the debate stage, and he's a former US Attorney) has said it's time to give it up:

“They allege fraud outside of the courtroom but when they go inside the courtroom they don’t plead fraud and they don’t argue fraud,” Christie said, adding “you have an obligation to present the evidence, the evidence has not been presented.”

 
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
4,989
Location
Texas
Unless the Trump team presents a rational, coherent case that not only claims fraud but actually shows proof of it in a lower court, nothing is going to go to the SC. They can say whatever they want at press conferences or on OAN without a legal penalty, but court is a different story, and so far, when asked directly by the judge, his lawyers have said they aren't claiming voter fraud. If they had actual evidence to present, they would have presented by now as the clock is running out.

The SC doesn't hear cases that are laughed out of lower courts with admonishments by the judges re: lack of merit.

Even Chris Christie (no matter what you might think of him, he's a staunch Trump supporter who worked with him through the debate stage, and he's a former US Attorney) has said it's time to give it up:

“They allege fraud outside of the courtroom but when they go inside the courtroom they don’t plead fraud and they don’t argue fraud,” Christie said, adding “you have an obligation to present the evidence, the evidence has not been presented.”

You are correct in that this is a mess if you will. The Trump Team is running out of options daily. Unless something is materially provided and hopefully this will be done in the next few days it is going to be tough. What many people do not realize is just because the Trump Team wants to have the SCOTUS hear the case they may in fact decline and that is even if it gets to them in time which is more doubtful as each day passes.

Hate it had hoped the Trump Legal Team would have had more evidence but maybe need to start spinning up the impeachment wheel of justice for old creepy Joe. You know it is coming!! :)
 
Top Bottom