CORONAVIRUS

Anal Disco

"Disco, Anal Disco"
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
18,167
Location
Alleged Easy Street
You are getting taxidermied and installed in the rape shed with a replaceable fleshlight where your mouth and buckeye are located.
I hope you pay top dollar for the worst taxidermist in Pissburgh so you come home one day after a long shift at IHOP to find a postmortem mix of fetid shit and embalming fluid all over your brand new carpets.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • When the COVID shots were first introduced, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made several claims about them that have since been proven completely false, including the claim that the mRNA would remain in the injection site, and that both the mRNA and resulting spike protein would rapidly be eliminated from your body
  • The mRNA goes everywhere and can remain intact for a month of more. Ditto for the spike protein your cells produce
  • Spike protein has been found in the brains of people with encephalitis (brain inflammation) and in jab-induced shingles lesions. Both mRNA and spike protein have been found in lymph nodes more than 60 days post-jab. Full-length mRNA has also been shown to circulate in people’s blood for up to 28 days post-injection, and it’s been detected in breastmilk
  • Research shows the primary difference between those who developed symptoms of myocarditis and those who didn’t was that symptomatic patients had markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein unbound by antibodies in their plasma. Those who remained asymptomatic had no free spike protein in their blood. This would suggest that free-floating spike protein is a problem
  • Autopsies of two teenage boys found dead in their beds three and four days after their second dose of Pfizer concluded jab-induced heart damage was to blame. The myocarditis described in these instances did not have the typical histopathology of myocarditis. Instead, both cases resemble catecholamine-induced injury, similar to the cytokine storm experienced in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection



When the COVID shots were first introduced, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made several claims about them that have since been proven completely false.
They claimed the mRNA in the shot would remain in and only affect the cells around the injection site. They also claimed the mRNA and resulting spike protein wouldn't last long in your body. The mRNA, they said, would vanish within "a few days," and the spike protein produced by your cells would be eliminated within "a few weeks."


er ya,

Guessing bench science dont work either obviously

x
 
  • Red
Reactions: Red

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road

According to the author of a report published in September 2022

"SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, but not nucleocapsid protein was sporadically detected in vessel walls by immunohistochemical assay … These findings indicate that myocarditis, as well as thrombo-embolic events following injection of spike-inducing gene-based vaccines, are causally associated with a injurious immunological response to the encoded agent.
Because of the fact that the immune response to a first gene-based vaccination is very low in comparison with the immune response to the second vaccination, the found adverse events has rather to be attributed to the mRNA-based second vaccination as to the initial vector-based one."

A Korean report published in July 2021 describes the case of a 22-year-old healthy male military recruit who developed chest pain five days after his first Pfizer dose and died just seven hours later. The primary cause of death was determined to be "myocarditis, causally associated with the BNT162b2 vaccine." Here, the primary autopsy findings were:
  1. Myocarditis predominantly involving the atrial wall, with neutrophil and histiocyte predominance
  2. Noninflammatory single-cell necrosis
  3. Diffuse contraction band necrosis (CBN) throughout the myocardium, predominantly in the left ventricle. CBN is a type of uncontrolled cell death that can occur during reperfusion (reoxygenation). Basically, the tissue is damaged when the blood returns into the tissue after a period of ischemia or lack of oxygen
  4. Enlargement of the heart
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road




Safety review of Sudafed
Cases of French girl, 18, and Turkish man, 56, struck down with extremely rare yet deadly side effect

  • Decongestant pseudoephedrine has been found to trigger PRES and RCVS
  • The EMA and MHRA are now undertaking safety reviews of the medicine


The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is 'reviewing available evidence' to see whether rules on selling products such as Sudafed and Day & Night Nurse need to change.
It follows new reports of two life-threatening complications, which can both cause strokes.


Its membership in the amphetamine class has made pseudoephedrine a sought-after chemical precursor in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine and methcathinone.

It was first characterized in 1889 by the German chemists Ladenburg and Oelschlägel, who used a sample that had been isolated from Ephedra vulgaris by the Merck pharmaceutical corporation of Darmstadt, Germany



SIDE EFFECTS - SOMETIMES INCONVENIENTLY COME TO LIGHT AFTER MORE THAN 100 years

and were talking about a cold medicine
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Cochrane Founder Warns Flu Vaccine Research Is Corrupted

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • Professor Peter Gøtzsche is a Danish physician-researcher who co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 and later launched the Nordic Cochrane Centre. He has been an outspoken critic of conflicts of interest and bias in research
  • After Gøtzsche co-wrote a scathing review of Cochrane’s 2018 review of HPV vaccine safety, Cochrane’s governing board expelled him and, in a February 9, 2020, tweet, Gøtzsche took aim at Cochrane’s review of influenza vaccine by alleging that a “financially conflicted” individual “rearranged” vaccine trial data to make it appear as though the influenza vaccine reduces mortality, when it doesn’t
  • In the 15 years prior to Gøtzsche’s expulsion, Cochrane had published several meta-reviews, showing flu vaccinations are ineffective for preventing influenza and influenza-like illness, and have no appreciable effect on hospitalizations and mortality
  • March 3, 2020, Maine residents will have the opportunity to go to the polls and repeal LD 798 to reinstate religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions by voting YES on ballot referendum Question 1
  • The “No on 1” ad campaign primarily financed by Big Pharma has already spent $476,000 on misleading television ads to defeat the ballot referendum that would restore vaccine exemptions in Maine. All but $56,000 for the ad campaign has been paid by vaccine manufacturers, which will profit from keeping the state’s “no exceptions” vaccine mandates (LD 798) in place

the drug industry is quick to claim that anyone questioning its integrity is part of a “war against science,”



No-Liability Industry Has No Right to Influence Policy





.
.






.



.




.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Cochrane Founder Highlights Corrupted Flu Vaccine Research
In a February 9, 2020, tweet, Gøtzsche wrote:5 “Cochrane corruption. A Cochrane review did not find that flu shots reduce deaths ... ‘After invitation from Cochrane,’ a financially conflicted person ‘re-arranged’ the data and vaccines reduced deaths. They don’t ...”
This information, he says, is included in his new book, “Vaccines: Truth, Lies and Controversy.” Indeed, in years’ past, Cochrane has repeatedly found flu vaccinations are ineffective and have no appreciable effect on influenza-related hospitalizations and mortality. For example:
•Its 2006 systematic review6 of 51 studies involving 263,987 children, which sought to “appraise all comparative studies evaluating the effects of influenza vaccines in healthy children; assess vaccine efficacy (prevention of confirmed influenza) and effectiveness (prevention of influenza-like illness)” found:
“Live vaccines showed an efficacy of 79% and an effectiveness of 33% in children older than two years compared with placebo or no intervention. Inactivated vaccines had a lower efficacy of 59% than live vaccines but similar effectiveness: 36%. In children under two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo.”
•Cochrane’s 2010 review7 of 50 influenza vaccine studies found that:
“In the relatively uncommon circumstance of vaccine matching the viral circulating strain and high circulation, 4% of unvaccinated people versus 1% of vaccinated people developed influenza symptoms ...
Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions ... Inactivated vaccines caused local harms and an estimated 1.6 additional cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome per million vaccinations ... There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.”
This review also included the following notice:
“WARNING: This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration). An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size.
Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.”
•Cochrane’s 2010 review8 of 75 studies of vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly concluded that:
“Due to the general low quality of non-RCTs and the likely presence of biases, which make interpretation of these data difficult and any firm conclusions potentially misleading, we were unable to reach clear conclusions about the effects of the vaccines in the elderly.”
•Cochrane’s 2018 review9 of 52 clinical studies on vaccines for preventing influenza in adults, including pregnant women, found only 15% of the studies were well-designed and conducted. Based on 25 studies that looked at inactivated influenza vaccines, Cochrane concluded they have only a minor protective effect against influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI), noting:
“Inactivated influenza vaccines probably reduce influenza in healthy adults from 2.3% without vaccination to 0.9% and they probably reduce ILI from 21.5% to 18.1% ... 71 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them experiencing influenza, and 29 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them experiencing an ILI ...
We identified one RCT and one controlled clinical trial assessing the effects of vaccination in pregnant women. The efficacy of inactivated vaccine containing pH1N1 against influenza was 50% in mothers (NNV [number needed to vaccinate] 55), and 49% in infants up to 24 weeks (NNV 56).
No data were available on efficacy against seasonal influenza during pregnancy. Evidence from observational studies showed effectiveness of influenza vaccines against ILI in pregnant women to be 24% (NNV 94), and against influenza in newborns from vaccinated women to be 41%.”
•In its 2018 review10 of 41 clinical trials on live and inactivated vaccines for preventing influenza in children, they found:
“Compared with placebo or do nothing, live attenuated influenza vaccines probably reduce the risk of influenza infection in children aged 3 to 16 years from 18% to 4%, and they may reduce ILI by a smaller degree, from 17% to 12% ...
Seven children would need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of influenza, and 20 children would need to be vaccinated to prevent one child experiencing an ILI ...
Compared with placebo or no vaccination, inactivated vaccines reduce the risk of influenza in children aged 2 to 16 years from 30% to 11%, and they probably reduce ILI from 28% to 20%.
Five children would need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of influenza, and 12 children would need to be vaccinated to avoid one case of ILI ...
Adverse event data were not well described in the available studies. Standardized approaches to the definition, ascertainment, and reporting of adverse events are needed.”
Two States Rejecting Big Pharma's Vaccine Mandates
In recent years, medical freedom has come under intense attack. In state after state, vaccine makers and their lobbyists have rammed through legislation that implements forced vaccination by eliminating vaccine exemptions. People in California, New York, Washington and Maine all lost vaccine exemptions last year, as detailed in the National Vaccine Information Center’s annual state legislation report “Vaccine Exemptions Under Attack in 2019.”
Although 4 states lost vaccine exemptions last year, exemptions were protected from removal in 22 other states by the active participation of vaccine choice advocates who educated legislators about why it is important to have flexible medical, religious and conscience exemptions in vaccine laws.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road

BusaVeloce

Has never sold a motorcycle
Joined
Jan 11, 2002
Messages
24,397
Location
Peyton Place (mid-coast Maine)
Website
www.infowars.com
(re-post from random vid thread...)

Woody Harrelson Trashes Big Pharma and COVID Corruption In SNL Opening Monologue

Actor Woody Harrelson had some choice words for the pharmaceutical industry and the COVID fearmongers while hosting NBC’s most recent episode of “Saturday Night Live.”
In his opening monologue, the “Zombieland” actor explained tongue-in-cheek his movie pitch about the “biggest drug cartels in the world” buying up the media and politicians to peddle their experimental vaccines.

“The movie goes like this: the biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take


the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over,” Harrelson said.

“I threw the script away,” Harrelson noted, drawing chuckles from the audience.

“I mean, who’s gonna believe that crazy idea?” he joked.

This is just another sign that the COVID narrative is collapsing in real time, as the Department of Energy is even admitting that that COVID-19 likely originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
 
OP
luckystrike

luckystrike

Non Binary, pronouns are Club/Ignore
Joined
Jan 1, 2002
Messages
60,811
Location
MC's Rape Shed
Website
lemonparty.org
He doesn't look well and sounds like all my friends who've been blazing for most of their lives...the cognitive decline is really starting to surface as they barrel towards 60
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road



STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • Vitamin D supplementation cut risk of death from COVID-19 by 51% and reduced risk of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) by 72%
  • The results were deemed “conclusive” and suggest “a definitive association between the protective role of vitamin D and ICU hospitalization” from COVID-19
  • Vitamin D may protect against COVID-19 by maintaining pulmonary barrier function, boosting the innate immune response and reducing the production of proinflammatory cytokines
  • In another study, none of the patients with severe COVID-19 who received high-dose vitamin D died; instead, 100% of the group improved
  • Regulatory agencies around the world are largely industry-funded, which is likely why they aren’t recommending vitamin D — a “dirt cheap” intervention — for COVID-19
Vitamin D Even Improves Pancreatic Cancer
Another little-talked-about benefit of vitamin D relates to pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest forms of cancer with a five-year survival rate of just 7.2%.3
 
  • Red
Reactions: Red

BigGar

high on placebo
Joined
Dec 12, 2001
Messages
46,792
Location
Hayabusaland, CA



STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • Vitamin D supplementation cut risk of death from COVID-19 by 51% and reduced risk of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) by 72%
  • The results were deemed “conclusive” and suggest “a definitive association between the protective role of vitamin D and ICU hospitalization” from COVID-19
  • Vitamin D may protect against COVID-19 by maintaining pulmonary barrier function, boosting the innate immune response and reducing the production of proinflammatory cytokines
  • In another study, none of the patients with severe COVID-19 who received high-dose vitamin D died; instead, 100% of the group improved
  • Regulatory agencies around the world are largely industry-funded, which is likely why they aren’t recommending vitamin D — a “dirt cheap” intervention — for COVID-19
Vitamin D Even Improves Pancreatic Cancer
Another little-talked-about benefit of vitamin D relates to pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest forms of cancer with a five-year survival rate of just 7.2%.3
I've been eating vitamin D like M&M's for the last couple of years. My last bloodwork showed I was over "100" and my GP was concerned and told me to back off a bit. Lots of reading told me that nothing gets dodgy unless you're over 200, and I was only at about 110. Fuck that. Two in the morning and two at night.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
I've been eating vitamin D like M&M's for the last couple of years. My last bloodwork showed I was over "100" and my GP was concerned and told me to back off a bit. Lots of reading told me that nothing gets dodgy unless you're over 200, and I was only at about 110. Fuck that. Two in the morning and two at night.
Your GP has no information about this drug. It is not made by a big pharma.
He has done no research, and the guidelines that exist about reccomended dosages are about as relevant as the US reccomendations on diet



remember this crock of shit?

.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
“I will just make the observation that the Chinese government … has been doing its best to try to thwart and obfuscate the work here, the work that we’re doing, the work that our US government and close foreign partners are doing,” he said.


noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

im shocked

“The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan,”


“On the origins-tracing of SARS-CoV-2, China has been open and transparent, and shared information and data on COVID-19 with the international community in a timely manner,” China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on Tuesday.


The WHO’s global COVID-19 trackers reported that, as of February 21, there had been more than 757 million virus infections and 6.85 million related deaths.

RELATED TO WHAT????

next headline, years too late:

FBI Director says drug companies lied and mrna technology needs to be properly studied. Mass vaccination program halted
 
Last edited:

BigGar

high on placebo
Joined
Dec 12, 2001
Messages
46,792
Location
Hayabusaland, CA


FBI Director Christopher Wray says his agency has assessed that a leak from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, was the likely cause of the COVID-19 pandemic.




whre all thos dumb shiyts that were screaming consirasy thery now?

????

??
Anybody with two brain cells to rub together knew from day one that it was leaked from that lab.
It was Captain Obvious obvious. The only question is whether it was intentional or not, and that doesn't really matter anyway.
There should be busloads of people around the world (mostly here and in China) swinging in gallows for this, but there won't be. Ever.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Inside the world of Westminster Whatsapps: Language expert reveals how Matt Hancock uses 'golf club banter', George Osborne is 'ironic, brief and dismissive' and Cummings is an 'eminence grise' in fascinating texts


 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
130526

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • There’s a growing trend to label long COVID and injuries from COVID-19 shots “functional neurological disorders” (FND), making some patients feel like the medical community thinks their symptoms are “all in their head”
  • Half of people with long COVID symptoms fit the criteria to be diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), which often flares up after viral infection
  • There’s a lack of consensus and definitions when it comes to FND and its potential treatments, even among those who are considered experts in the field
  • FND has also been used as a diagnosis to explain away adverse reactions to COVID-19 shots
  • Long COVID symptoms share many similarities with post-jab injuries, and it’s likely both are rooted in mitochondrial dysfunction; improving your mitochondrial function will help reverse the problems caused by the jab or the virus


Is Long COVID Akin to 'Hysteria'?
In an article for TNR, journalist Natalie Shure writes, "The most direct precursor to FND is something you've probably heard of: hysteria."4 For centuries, women were diagnosed with "hysteria" to describe a mental disorder that could give rise to physical and other symptoms ranging from seizures and anxiety to pain and paralysis.


It's now being suggested that "some post-COVID symptoms may be produced by the brain," Shure notes. "Does that make them any less real?" For instance, half of people with long COVID symptoms fit the criteria to be diagnosed with ME/CFS and some in the community have suggested the symptoms could be due to ME/CFS, which often flares up after viral infection.6
But it's far from that simple, as symptoms of long COVID include everything from shortness of breath and pounding heart to dizziness, brain fog and depression. Even the CDC states:7
"People with post-COVID conditions may develop or continue to have symptoms that are hard to explain and manage. Clinical evaluations and results of routine blood tests, chest x-rays, and electrocardiograms may be normal.
The symptoms are similar to those reported by people with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) and other poorly understood chronic illnesses that may occur after other infections. People with these unexplained symptoms may be misunderstood by their healthcare providers, which can result in a long time for them to get a diagnosis and receive appropriate care or treatment."
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Many Experience Post-Jab Long COVID
It's interesting to note that, in one study from early in the pandemic, more than two-thirds of those reporting long COVID symptoms had negative antibody tests, suggesting at least some of them didn't even have COVID-19.13 Meanwhile, many COVID jab recipients report long COVID-like symptoms.
As reported by Science magazine, "In rare cases, coronavirus vaccines may cause long COVID-like symptoms,"14 which can include (but is not limited to) brain fog, memory problems, headaches, blurred vision, loss of smell, nerve pain, heart rate fluctuations, dramatic blood pressure swings and muscle weakness. The feeling of "internal electric shocks" are also reported.
The primary difference15 between post-jab long COVID and long COVID symptoms after infection is that in people who get it from the infection, early treatment was withheld and the resulting infection severe. Post-jab long COVID, on the other hand, can occur either after very mild breakthrough infection or no breakthrough infection at all.
The Dark Side of FND for COVID Jab Injuries
With many of the symptoms of COVID shot injuries mirroring those of long COVID, we're now also seeing the use of FND as a diagnosis to explain away adverse reactions to COVID-19 shots.
One case involves Maddie de Garay, who was a healthy 12-year-old when she signed up for Pfizer's COVID-19 trial for 12- to 15-year-olds. She suffered a severe systemic adverse reaction to her second dose of the shot, however, and struggled through 11 ER visits and four hospital admissions in the year and a half that followed.
Injuries from the shot have left her unable to walk or eat — she receives her nutrition via a feeding tube — and suffering from constant pain, vision problems, tinnitus, allergic reactions and lack of neck control.16
As though the physical trauma wasn't enough, Maddie and her family were continually dismissed by the medical professionals put in place to help, ignored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and denied the care needed to help Maddie.
In Pfizer's April 2021 disclosure of Maddie's case to the FDA, it's stated only that she had "functional abdominal pain."17 Then, a day before Pfizer submitted their request for emergency approval of the COVID-19 shot for 12- to 15-year-olds to the FDA, they added functional neurological disorder as a diagnosis in Maddie's chart,18 blaming the side effects from the shot on FND.
Further, once this assessment was made, her physician, Dr. Amal Assa'ad at Cincinnati Children's Hospital, went so far as to advise against any further investigation, even though Maddie was a participant in a clinical trial:19
"My assessment is that Madeline has a functional impairment that is not organic in nature … I also discourage further work up since this is usually detrimental in functional disorders because it drives the patient to thinking that there must be something wrong that is indicating all this work up. It also delays the necessary psychologic intervention that is needed to help resolve the functional disorder."
 

Rhino

K-9 BAMF
Joined
Dec 12, 2001
Messages
24,810
Location
Fuck you
my belief

covid was an intential release by China do to President Trump's China Trade Agreement Policies.

This was an act of chemical/biological war done so to intimidate the world that China will not bow down to threats on loosing their hold on its trade to foreign Countries.

but that is just my take on it.


MY Dictorship would have Bombed them.
 

tinhead

Has never named a pet
Joined
Jan 1, 2002
Messages
39,214
Location
Northeast CT
The virus can't have leaked from a lab. Your pretend to be president said the virus doesn't exist, how could it leak?

All while he and his cronies were max vaxing themselves and their families.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
my belief

covid was an intential release by China do to President Trump's China Trade Agreement Policies.

This was an act of chemical/biological war done so to intimidate the world that China will not bow down to threats on loosing their hold on its trade to foreign Countries.

but that is just my take on it.


MY Dictorship would have Bombed them.
Jeezuz, I hope that isnt true. A deliberate leak of an indiscriminate killer virus like that for any reason is a "dirty bomb" aimed at civilians. Thats terrorism pure and simple

State sponsored terrorism of that magnitude is reserved for extreemist regimes without power usually.
China is not powerless.
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • Die Welt, a mainstream media outlet in Germany, revealed that numerous subjects who suffered adverse events, including deaths, during Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot trials were removed from the trial data
  • A person known as “Pfizer subject C4591001 1162 11621327” died three days after receiving the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID shot, reportedly due to stroke and arteriosclerosis; it was deemed unrelated to the shots
  • The CDC has since warned that people ages 65 and older who received Pfizer’s updated (bivalent) COVID-19 booster shot may be at increased risk of stroke
  • Die Welt also revealed contradictions in Pfizer documents, adverse events from the shot downplayed and mass unblinding of study subjects, which wasn’t revealed in a later approval study
  • In November 2020, Pfizer claimed their COVID-19 shot was 95% effective against COVID-19, but this was highly misleading and based on flawed methodology, including excluding people who got COVID-19 within 14 days after their first shot
  • Pfizer has profited immensely despite the concerns, earning a record $100 billion in 2022, including $37.8 billion for its COVID-19 shots and $18.9 billion for its antiviral drug Paxlovid

Pfizer Falsely Ruled Deaths Were Unrelated to Shots
Another subject in Pfizer's trial also died 20 days after the shots. The death was ruled as due to a cardiac arrest. But pharmaceutical specialist Susanne Wagner told Die Welt:7

"According to the current state of science, these two cases would be assigned to the vaccination, especially since the U.S. health authority CDC is currently investigating strokes in vaccinated people and it is known. [Pfizer's investigators] falsely ruled these deaths unrelated."
Indeed, an announcement made by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration warned that people ages 65 and older who received Pfizer's updated (bivalent) COVID-19 booster shot may be at increased risk of stroke.8

The CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), which uses near real-time surveillance to track vaccine safety, flagged the potential safety issue, revealing that those 65 and over were more likely to have an ischemic stroke 21 days after receiving Pfizer's bivalent COVID-19 shot compared to 22 to 44 days later.9

The FDA and CDC released the statement on a Friday night before a three-day weekend, "which is proof they wanted to bury it," Dr. Meryl Nass, a board-certified internal medicine physician with special expertise in vaccine safety and vaccine mandates, said.10 Even Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo tweeted about the odd timing:11,12

"What better time than a Friday afternoon for @CDCgov and @US_FDA to let Americans know that the mRNA shots they've been pushing may be causing strokes? Don't worry, we'll make sure the word gets out — just like we've been doing for months."
Die Welt also revealed contradictions in Pfizer documents and mass unblinding of study subjects, which wasn't revealed in a later approval study:13

"In one fell swoop, the test management said goodbye to 53 subjects on August 31, 2020. The test candidates were 'unblinded,' which means they were informed about their vaccination status, a process that the Pfizer study protocol expressly only provides for 'in emergencies.'
But there is nothing about it in the approval study. In protocol documents that are available to WELT, and which are actually not intended for the public, those responsible get caught up in contradictions."
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Severe Adverse Reaction to Shots Brushed Off
Another example revealed by Die Welt involves trial participant Augusto Roux, a lawyer in Argentina. After receiving his second dose of Pfizer's COVID-19 shot, he experienced shortness of breath and chest pain, and passed out. Within days, he visited a hospital for his symptoms, where he tested negative for COVID-19 but a CT scan showed fluid, or pericardial effusion, in Roux's heart.

A physician noted in his chart, "Adverse reaction to the coronavirus vaccine (high probability)." Despite this connection and ongoing health problems, this adverse reaction was downplayed by Pfizer and listed as unrelated to the shots. According to Die Welt:14

"Over the next few months, Roux lost 14 kilos [30.8 pounds], he had liver problems, and his heart sometimes beat irregularly … The diagnosis for the symptoms after the second vaccination is very likely to be 'pericarditis,' inflammation of the heart. All of this fits exactly with a clinical picture that the Paul Ehrlich Institute also has in its list of 'rare side effects' for mRNA vaccines.
… His story, one might think, should appear in Pfizer's pivotal study papers, but it doesn't. The pharmaceutical company's papers say Roux informed the research team that he was hospitalized with pneumonia on both sides, following the initial report, which was classified as an 'adverse event of toxicity level 1.'
That could have nothing to do with the vaccine, the file goes on to say, it is probably a Covid infection. Not a word that Roux had tested negative for Corona in several PCR tests."
Pfizer Created an 'Illusion' of Effectiveness
In November 2020, Pfizer claimed its COVID-19 shot was 95% effective against COVID-19, but this was highly misleading and based on flawed methodology.15 One trick used to get this misleadingly high efficacy figure is to ignore people who got COVID-19 within 14 days after their first shot.

In Pfizer's trial, 37.2% of those who were tested for COVID-19 within 13 days of their first shot were positive — but not counted as such. How can this skew results? As explained on Substack's "Where are the numbers," a newsletter about the abuse of science and statistics:16

"Imagine the most extreme case in which every vaccinated person gets covid within the first two weeks of their first dose. Then, assuming (as is likely) that none get infected a second time within the 19 weeks, according to the study definition no vaccinated people ever got covid over the whole period of the study.
If only one person in the the unvaccinated comparative cohort had got covid, over the same period, the vaccine efficacy (defined as one minus the proportion of vaccinated infected divided by the proportion of unvaccinated infected times 100) will be reported as 100%."
The study found that during any two-week period from December 28, 2020, to May 19, 2021, the COVID-19 infection rate was about 0.8%, compared to 37.2% among those tested within two weeks of their first shot.

"If people were tested every two weeks then we could reasonably conclude the vaccinated were getting infected — within two weeks of their first jab — at a rate that was almost 50 times greater than the general rate for this population," but "if you don't look for covid, by not testing for it, or by ignoring the test results you won't find it."17

They also pointed out that no deaths occurred among the participants who tested positive for COVID-19 and had at least one COVID-19-like symptom, including among the 812 (out of 1,482) who were unvaccinated. But since this clearly makes the shots look unnecessary and ineffective, it was conveniently ignored:18

"[T]here was a grand total of zero deaths: an infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0%. And 812 of those were unvaccinated. Bear in mind that this when covid was supposed to have been rampaging globally and causing widespread death.
And of course that nugget somehow never got mentioned in the abstract, mains results, conclusions, or discussion. It only appeared in the detailed results section (along with the fact that only 2% were hospitalized)."
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
More Deaths in the Shot Group Than the Placebo Group
Former Blackrock portfolio manager Edward Dowd also warned about problems with Pfizer's trial. A friend from the biotech industry told him that the all-cause mortality endpoint had been missed by Pfizer in the original clinical trial, meaning that in the jab group there were more deaths than in the placebo group. Normally, during the drug approval process, if you fail that endpoint, you do not get approved.

Dowd said. "When that came out in November, the biotech executives who saw that decided they weren't going to get boosters, and the people who weren't vaxxed were not going to get vaxxed."19

Whistleblower Brooke Jackson, a regional director formerly employed by Pfizer subcontractor Ventavia Research Group, which was testing Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, also witnessed falsified data, unblinded patients, inadequately trained vaccinators and lack of proper follow-up on adverse events that were reported.

"I was working on Pfizer's trial," she said in the film "Anecdotals."20 "What I saw was like nothing I've ever seen before." She explained:21

"The speed in which they were enrolling in the study — four to five coordinators pushing through 40, 50, 60 patients a day. We were not storing the vaccine at its appropriate temperature, the failures in reporting serious adverse events. We had so many reports of adverse events … we just could not keep up. The study doctor signed a physical exam when he wasn't even in clinic.
Then Ventavia had unblinded every patient that was randomized in the trial. When we brought it to their attention, that's what we were instructed to do — remove the evidence and destroy it. Emails about mislabeled blood specimens per Pfizer's protocol, we should have immediately stopped enrolling, but they never told Pfizer.
I would bring the concerns to my managers and it was, 'We're understaffed.' The FDA — they only see what Pfizer gives them. So I was documenting all of this. And on the 25th of September, I went directly to the FDA, and about six and a half hours later, I lost my job. I was fired."
The FDA and Pfizer attempted to hide the COVID-19 shot clinical trial data for 75 years, but the FDA was ordered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas to release redacted versions of trial documents on a much faster schedule. As part of the court order, 80,000 pages of documents related to the FDA's approval of Pfizer's COVID-19 shots were released June 1, 2022.22

Among those documents were case report forms revealing that deaths and severe adverse events took place during Phase 3 trials, but, as reported by Children's Health Defense, Pfizer had "a trend of classifying almost all adverse events — and in particular severe adverse events — as being 'not related' to the vaccine."23

Pfizer has profited immensely nonetheless, earning a record $100 billion in 2022, including $37.8 billion for its COVID-19 shots and $18.9 billion for its antiviral drug Paxlovid.24
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
131833

Billions Of Lives Saved By Man Wearing Mask While Alone In Car

no im not going to post a link to the youfag video

oh ok then



Are you wearing your mask right now???
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • In a March 5, 2023, memorandum, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic laid out evidence showing Dr. Anthony Fauci prompted the creation of a paper to “disprove” the lab leak theory, and that the authors of this paper skewed available evidence to achieve that goal
  • According to the Subcommittee, while Dr. Jeremy Farrar — former head of the Wellcome Trust and now chief scientist for the World Health Organization — is not credited as having had any involvement with the fabricated paper, evidence suggests he actually led the drafting process, and “made direct edits” to the paper
  • The Telegraph has reviewed more than 100,000 leaked WhatsApp messages sent between health officials, ministers and other government officials, showing the British government was intentionally deploying scare tactics to force compliance with lockdowns and other COVID measures
  • Then-health secretary Matt Hancock said he wanted to “deploy” a new COVID variant to “frighten the pants off” the public. One of his media advisers, Damon Poole, agreed with the plan, saying “Yep that’s what will get proper behavior change”
  • The messages show officials mocking travelers forced into quarantine and other deplorable behaviors. They also show decisions were made on the fly, for political reasons rather than scientific ones

As noted in the memorandum,6 in a February 8, 2020, email, Andersen stated: "Our main work over the last couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory …" Furthermore, in a February 12 email to the journal Nature, Andersen openly and clearly admitted Fauci's and Collins' influence:7
"Prompted by Jeremy Farrah [sic], Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins, Eddie Holmes, Andrew Rambaut, Bob Garry, Ian Lipkin, and myself have been working through much of the (primarily) genetic data to provide agnostic and scientifically informed hypothesis around the origins of the virus."
"This email directly contradicts Scripps' earlier statement that Dr. Andersen 'objectively' weighed all the evidence regarding the origins of COVID-19. Instead, it appears that Dr. Andersen was given direction and sought to formulate a paper, regardless of available evidence, that would disprove a lab leak," the Subcommittee writes.8
Pangolin Narrative Was a Red Herring From the Start
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road


Day & Night Nurse and Covonia cold and flu remedies are being WITHDRAWN from UK market over health fears

Cold and flu remedies are being urgently pulled from shelves over fears they could be deadly.

The review found the benefits of pholcodine-containing cough and cold medicines 'do not outweigh the increased risk of the very rare event of anaphylaxis'.
Pholcodine is mostly found in household cough syrups and the recall includes syrups and lozenges which are on shelves across the country.

It comes as bosses at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended their withdrawal from the EU market over three months ago in December 2022, following similar concerns.

YES, 3 MONTHS

WITH THALIDOMIDE, IT WAS 3 YEARS

one day VACCINES....
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Study: More Infant Vaccines Lead to Higher Infant Mortality

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • In 2011, Neil Miller, Ph.D., and Gary Goldman, Ph.D., published a paper in the journal Human & Experimental Toxicology showing infant mortality rates correlated with childhood vaccination rates, with high-uptake countries having higher child mortality
  • In January 2022, Goldman discussed the CDC’s suppression of undesirable vaccine data in an interview. In December that year, the Miller Lab at Brigham Young University in Utah, as part of the BYU Bioinformatics Capstone course, reanalyzed the Miller-Goldman paper in an effort to debunk it
  • In response to the critique, Miller and Goldman conducted their own reanalysis, which was published in the peer-reviewed journal Cureus in early February 2023. The paper confirmed their 2011 conclusion that there’s a positive correlation between vaccine doses and infant mortality rates
  • Data from the first few months of the pandemic seem to confirm this link, as the death rate for American children under 18 dropped during lockdowns, from an average of 700 per week to fewer than 500 per week during the months of April and May in 2020
  • The decades-long work of Christine Stabell Benn, a clinical professor at University of Southern Denmark and her colleague Peter Aaby, a vaccine scientist, shows six of the 10 vaccines investigated increase infant mortality by rendering children more susceptible to other lethal diseases
"The U.S. childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year — the most in the world — yet 33 nations have lower IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants.

Nations were also grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges: 12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26. The mean IMRs of all nations within each group were then calculated.

Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, with r = 0.992 (p = 0.0009)

Using the Tukey-Kramer test, statistically significant differences in mean IMRs were found between nations giving 12–14 vaccine doses and those giving 21–23, and 24–26 doses. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs is essential."

Goldman had initially joined the CDC thinking that it was the gold standard in unbiased research, but over the years, he realized that wasn't the case. The CDC barred him from publishing any findings that linked the vaccination program with negative health outcomes, which led to his resignation in 2002, as he did not want to participate in research fraud.
He discussed the CDC's suppression of undesirable vaccine data in a January 2022 interview.4 Then, all of a sudden, in December 2022, members of the Miller Lab at Brigham Young University in Utah, as part of the BYU Bioinformatics Capstone course, reanalyzed5 the Miller-Goldman paper and tried to debunk it yet again.


Critique Prompts Reanalysis
In response to the critique, Miller and Goldman conducted their own reanalysis, which was published in the peer-reviewed journal Cureus in early February 2023. The paper, "Reaffirming a Positive Correlation Between Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality Rates: A Response to Critics,"6 not only examines the critics' claims and methods, but also includes additional analyses to assess the reliability of their original findings. As explained in the abstract:7

"The critics' reanalysis combines 185 developed and Third World nations that have varying rates of vaccination and socioeconomic disparities. Despite the presence of inherent confounding variables, a small, statistically significant positive correlation of r = 0.16 (p < .03) is reported that corroborates the positive trend in our study.

Multiple linear regression analyses report high correlations between IMR and HDI, but the number of vaccine doses as an additional predictor is not statistically significant. This finding is a likely consequence of known misclassification errors in HDI.

Linear regression of IMR as a function of percentage vaccination rates reports statistically significant inverse correlations for 7 of 8 vaccines. However, several anomalies in the scatter plots of the data suggest that the chosen linear model is problematic.

Our odds ratio analysis conducted on the original dataset controlled for several variables. None of these variables lowered the correlation below 0.62, thus robustly confirming our findings.

Our sensitivity analysis reported statistically significant positive correlations between the number of vaccine doses and IMR when we expanded our original analysis from the top 30 to the 46 nations with the best IMRs. Additionally, a replication of our original study using updated 2019 data corroborated the trend we found in our first paper (r = 0.45, p = .002)

Conclusions: A positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses and IMRs is detectable in the most highly developed nations but attenuated in the background noise of nations with heterogeneous socioeconomic variables that contribute to high rates of infant mortality, such as malnutrition, poverty, and substandard health care."
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road


Striking Decline in SIDS During COVID
In 2020, health authorities bemoaned the fact that COVID fears and lockdowns had the "unfortunate" side effect of lowering routine childhood vaccination rates. Vaccine safety advocates, on the other hand, predicted the decline might actually have a positive impact.
Childhood vaccines have long been suspected of being a contributing factor to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).8 As noted by Australian researcher Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.:9
"Vaccination is undoubtedly the single biggest and most preventable cause of cot-death … The timing of 80% of the cot [crib] deaths occurring between the second and sixth months is due to the cumulative effect of infections, timing of immunizations and some inherent specifics in the baby's early development."
What's more, according to researchers at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Kaiser Permanente, the sharp decline in infant vaccinations began in early March 2020 — the same month that infant deaths started declining.13 Is that coincidence or a sign of causality?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, i wonder
 

nomad

TRANSVAXXITE
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
10,396
Location
On the road
Six of 10 Vaccines Investigated Found to Increase Mortality
Other compelling evidence linking vaccines and infant mortality comes from the decades-long work of Dr. Christine Stabell Benn, a clinical professor at University of Southern Denmark and her colleague Dr. Peter Aaby, a vaccine scientist and promoter of vaccination commissioned by the WHO to study the effects of vaccines used in charitable programs.

131922


Overall, inactivated (non-live) vaccines increased mortality, especially among girls, even when they offered a high degree of protection against the target disease. This was true for the DTP, pentavalent vaccine, inactivated polio vaccine, H1N1 influenza vaccine and the hepatitis B vaccine.

GlaxoSmithKline's antimalarial vaccine (RTS, S/AS01 or RTS,S, sold under the brand name Mosquirix), which appears to offer between 18% and 36.3% protection against malaria depending on the age group,26 was also found to increase overall mortality, in this case by a whopping 24%. As Stabell Benn told Science News DK:27

 
Top Bottom