CORONAVIRUS

[Vicious_Cycle]

44-year-old female vegetarian MSNBC host is hospitalized for almost 10 days for heart inflammation, blames everything but the obvious cause (substack.com)

.

 

[Vicious_Cycle]

Today's "Coincidence of the Day" Award goes to Sandra Carmona. Congratulations Sandra!

Pain in Spain: journalist Sandra Carmona died at the age of 42 | News Rebeat
.

 

[nomad]

COVID Shots May Have Damaged Pilots' Hearts
On an EKG, a normal PR interval measures 0.12 to 0.2 seconds.3 If the PR interval is shorter or longer than this, it can be indicative of a problem. According to Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, the FAA widened the acceptable EKG parameters from a PR max of 0.2 to 0.3, and potentially even higher. He says:4

"They didn't widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot. It was done after the vaccine rollout. This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it. But you can't hide these things for long. This is a tacit admission from the U.S. government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage."

Kirsch gives five reasons why he's confident these widened parameters were necessary due to the widespread heart damage pilots — and the U.S. public — experienced due to COVID-19 shots. According to Kirsch:5

"I believe it is because they knew if they kept the original range, too many pilots would have to be grounded. That would be extremely problematic; commercial aviation in the US would be severely disrupted. And why did they do that quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream media?

I'm pretty sure they won't tell me, so I'll speculate: it's because they didn't want anyone to know. In other words, the COVID vaccine has seriously injured a lot of pilots and the FAA knows it and said nothing because that would tip off the country that the vaccines are unsafe. And you aren't allowed to do that."

Five Clues COVID Shots Are Likely to Blame
Five factors suggest that pilots' worsening heart health is due to COVID-19 shots, and not COVID-19. As noted by Kirsch, they include:6

1. The change in EKG parameters was made quietly. "If it was COVID, you can be public. But the vaccine is supposed to be safe."
2. The timing of the change in October 2022, which is later than it would have been if COVID-19 were to blame. "If it was due to COVID, it would have happened well before now. They can make changes every month."
3. The widespread injuries. "The vaccine creates far more injury to the heart than COVID." For instance, an Israeli study of adults who did not get a COVID-19 shot but did get COVID-19 found the infection was not associated with myocarditis or pericarditis.7
4. Anecdotal reports from cardiologists about heart damage began post-shot.
5. Many sudden deaths have been reported post-shot.

Kirsch estimates that 20% of pilots screened may have suffered heart damage due to COVID-19 shots, based on an upcoming study set to be published in The Epoch Times. A Thailand study also revealed "cardiovascular manifestations" including rapid heartbeat (tachycardia), palpitation and myopericarditis in 29.24% of adolescents who'd received an mRNA COVID-19 shot.8
"But kids are indestructible so a 30% injury rate in kids translates into a higher rate for adults," Kirsch says, adding:9

"Bottom line: The most logical conclusion is that the FAA knows the hearts of our nation's pilots have been injured by the COVID vaccine that they were coerced into taking, the number of pilots affected is huge, the cardiac damage is extensive, and passenger safety is being compromised by the lowering of the standards to enable pilots to fly.

The right thing would be for the FAA to come clean and admit to the American public that the COVID vaccine has injured 20% or more of the pilots (based on their limited EKG screening), but I doubt that they will ever do that."

What's the Explanation for Long COVID?

If you're suffering from the effects of long COVID, there are several strategies you can try to improve your quality of life. Here are some recommendations.

articles.mercola.com

 

[nomad]

Judge Halts Free Speech Ban for Doctors

Judge Halts Free Speech Ban for Doctors - Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health

A judge has put the brakes on a bad California law that would censor doctors. A California judge issued a preliminary injunction last week which prevents AB 2098 from being enforced for the time being. This law was approved last year and gives the state medical board the power to target doctors...

anh-usa.org

A California judge issued a preliminary injunction last week which prevents AB 2098 from being enforced for the time being. This law was approved last year and gives the state medical board the power to target doctors who disseminate “misinformation” regarding COVID. As we argued at the time, this is part of a wider effort on the part of some states and mainstream medical organizations to quash dissent among doctors who don’t toe the conventional thinking on COVID treatments. Under the guise of protecting public health, these bills are really all about enriching special interests that benefit from one-size-fits-all medicine, notably Big Pharma, since only FDA-approved drugs can claim to treat or prevent diseases. All other modalities, no matter how much science there is to back them, would be shut out. A preliminary injunction doesn’t eliminate the law, but it is a critical step in the right direction towards invalidating it. Importantly, we hope the court challenges will dissuade other state legislatures from pursuing this kind of censorship.

“Contemporary scientific consensus” lacks an established meaning within the medical community, and defendants do not propose one. The statute provides no clarity on the term’s meaning, leaving open multiple important questions. For instance, who determines whether a consensus exists to begin with? If a consensus does exist, among whom must the consensus exist (for example practicing physicians, or professional organizations, or medical researchers, or public health officials, or perhaps a combination)? In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? What level of agreement constitutes a consensus (perhaps a plurality, or a majority, or a supermajority)? How recently in time must the consensus have been established to be considered “contemporary”? And what source or sources should physicians consult to determine what the consensus is at any given time (perhaps peer-reviewed scientific articles, or clinical guidelines from professional organizations, or public health recommendations)? The statute provides no means of understanding to what “scientific consensus” refers.

These are all fair questions, but we know the basic answer. The law is intended to ban the dissemination of any COVID information the establishment doesn’t like. They’ll know it when they see it; don’t ask for specificity!

The cases must be fully litigated to reach a final decision, but we are hopeful that the truth will prevail, and this terrible law will be stricken.

The California bill, and similar bills that have been considered by other state legislatures, would prevent your doctor from telling you about the wide body of evidence suggesting the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for COVID-19. They are also designed to prevent or scare doctors from advising patients about the dangers of COVID vaccination. Who knows, maybe your doctor telling you about the benefits of vitamin D or other supplements for immune support and COVID prevention would constitute “misinformation.” If government health authorities determine the “scientific consensus,” only FDA-approved treatments could be discussed or administered by doctors for COVID—meaning vaccines and/or drugs. Any discussion of supplements, which are included in many COVID protocols, could be forbidden under these laws, no matter how much evidence there is supporting their use. This will enrich all of those who stand to make money off of the standard of care and the one-size-fits-all paradigm—namely, Big Pharma.

This would be a disaster. Natural medicine is predicated on the idea that each patient has individual needs based on unique biology and genetics. If doctors aren’t allowed to discuss alternatives to the mainstream medical approach not only are the legal requirements of informed consent not being satisfied, but integrative doctors’ ability to treat individual patients will suffer. And it’s not just treatments; this censorship crusade could also be applied to doctors telling you about complementary support modalities like yoga, meditation, acupuncture, massage therapy, and others.

As of right now, New Jersey is considering a similar bill to California’s, except that it isn’t just limited to COVID, making it much, much more dangerous. Want to learn about magnesium’s sleep benefits before your doctor prescribes Ambien? Want to learn about chromium’s effect on blood sugar before you go on a diabetes drug? Your doctor may not be able to discuss any of that with you if this bill passes in NJ.

NJ residents can click here to take action, and we will update you accordingly if similar bills come up in other states.

 

[nomad]

FDA Rejects CBD as a Supplement - Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health

Today the FDA officially denied requests to permit CBD in food or supplements. Action Alert! The FDA just released a statement explaining that the “existing regulatory framework” for foods and supplements are not appropriate for CBD and that a new regulatory pathway is needed. The agency also...

anh-usa.org

The FDA just released a statement explaining that the “existing regulatory framework” for foods and supplements are not appropriate for CBD and that a new regulatory pathway is needed. The agency also denied three Citizens Petitions requesting the agency issue a regulation that would allow CBD to be sold as a supplement

 

[sailUSVI]

Read it…..

How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right ⋆ Brownstone Institute

The argument that reduced transmission from the non-vulnerable to the vulnerable as a result of mass “vaccination” could only stand if the long-term safety of the “vaccine” had been established, which it had not.

brownstone.org

 

[nomad]

To offer some examples of statements that were proven false by data but not explicitly walked back:

“You’re not going to get COVID if you get these vaccinations… We are in a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” – Joe Biden;

“The vaccines are safe. I promise you…” – Joe Biden;

“The vaccines are safe and effective.” – Anthony Fauci.

“Our data from the CDC suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, do not get sick – and it’s not just in the clinical trials but it’s also in real world data.” – Dr. Rochelle Walensky.

“We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in… in serious condition and many on ventilators.” – Justice Sotomayer (during a case to determine legality of Federal “vaccine” mandates)…


Dont need to read 16 points to understand that the Govt and pharma lied and manip[ulated statistics

but this is no proof that these drugs are neither safe nor effective.
WE JUST DONT HAVE THE DATA TO SUPPORT THAT
however, you would have to be a total idiot to argue for a mass vaccination program given the lack of data that exists

 

[nomad]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• In January 2022, House Oversight Committee Republicans released a batch of emails sent to and from the National Institutes of Health. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit brought by Jimmy Tobias at The Intercept also forced the release of unredacted NIH correspondence
• The emails reveal there was great concern among NIH leadership, as SARS-CoV-2 appeared to be a genetically engineered virus that somehow escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China
• The emails show they were nervous about the possibility that they’d funded the creation of this virus, and that they were determined to suppress questions about its origin
• A group of scientists convened by Dr. Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, published a paper in which they claimed the virus was decidedly not the result of intentional engineering. They did admit accidental creation in a lab could not be ruled out, but that natural evolution was the most likely scenario. Some of these same scientists had previously shared details indicative of genetic engineering in emails to Fauci
• The “Proximal Origin” paper, which was edited by Fauci and “debunked” the lab leak theory without any evidence, became the most-read published paper in history. More than 2,000 media outlets have cited it to support their propaganda

As reported by the House Oversight Committee:6

"Excerpts of emails released today reveal the following:

• January 27, 2020: Dr. [Anthony] Fauci knew NIAID [National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] had funded EcoHealth Alliance, the WIV was a subgrantee of EcoHealth, and EcoHealth was not in compliance with its grant reporting, in particular a grant that NIAID knew had gain-of-function potential on novel bat coronaviruses.
• February 1, 2020: Dr. Fauci, [then-NIH director] Dr. [Francis] Collins, and at least eleven other scientists convened a conference call to discuss COVID-19. On the conference call, Drs. Fauci and Collins were first warned that COVID-19 may have leaked from the WIV and may have been intentionally genetically manipulated.
• February 4, 2020: After speaking with Drs. Fauci and Collins, four participants of the conference call abandoned their belief the virus originated from the Wuhan lab and authored a paper7 entitled 'The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.' Prior to final publication in Nature Medicine, the paper was sent to Dr. Fauci for editing and approval.
• April 16, 2020: More than two months after the original conference call, Dr. Collins emailed Dr. Fauci expressing dismay that the Nature Medicine article — which they saw prior to publication and were given the opportunity to edit — did not squash the lab leak hypothesis and asks if the NIH can do more to 'put down' the lab leak hypothesis.
• April 17, 2020: After Dr. Collins explicitly asked for more public pressure, Dr. Fauci cited the Nature Medicine paper from the White House podium likely in an effort to further stifle the hypothesis COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan lab."

Fauci Tipped Off About Lab Leak Possibility

January 31, 2020, Fauci received an email from Dr. Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, asking him to call Kristian Andersen, Ph.D., an evolutionary biologist and professor in the department of immunology and microbiology at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California. As reported by The Intercept January 19, 2023:8

"Fauci had his phone call with Andersen that night, and what he heard clearly disturbed him. In an email to Farrar after the call, he wrote the following:

'I told [Andersen] that as soon as possible he and Eddie Holmes should get a group of evolutionary biologists together to examine carefully the data to determine if his concerns are validated. He should do this very quickly and if everyone agrees with this concern, they should report it to the appropriate authorities.

I would imagine that in the USA this would be the FBI and in the UK it would be MI5' … What were Andersen's concerns? And why were they so dire they might merit a call to the FBI?

Andersen laid them out plainly in an email to Fauci that same evening. 'The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,' Andersen wrote in the email.

'I should mention,' he added, 'that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.'"

 

[scottcolbath]

How do you know if someone is unvaccinated? They'll tell you.

The same way people who own POS vehicles tell us about their cars.

 

[luckystrike]

Colbert is such a douche

 

[Wretch]

 

[Wretch]

 

[nomad]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• January 25, 2023, Project Veritas released an undercover video of Dr. Jordon Trishton Walker, director of Research and Development for Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning at Pfizer, discussing an internal plan to “direct the evolution” of the COVID-19 virus in order to make more money from COVID boosters
• According to Walker, Pfizer is doing research to make the virus “more potent,” and this research is “ongoing”
• Walker explains how the drug industry has captured American regulators, and states that while it’s good for the industry, “it’s bad for everyone else in America”
• At 8 p.m., January 27, 2023, two days after Project Veritas released the video, Pfizer finally published a response which, oddly enough, seems to substantiate rather than refute Walker’s claims
• Pfizer basically denies using “directed evolution” in its vaccine development, but suggests it may be used in ongoing Paxlovid-related research

Pfizer Considering Mutating COVID to Drive Profits
In the undercover video, you can hear Walker saying:

"You know how the virus keeps mutating? Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we could focus on — so we could create and preemptively develop new vaccines, right?

So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that, though, there's a risk of, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.

So, we're like, do we want to do this? So, that's like one of the things we're considering, for, like, the future, like maybe we can, like, create new versions of the vaccines and things like that."

The Fallout Caused by Remdesivir

Calls for a criminal investigation into remdesivir are being initiated, as it is believed to be responsible for causing injury to Americans. See details here.

articles.mercola.com

 

[nomad]

Project Veritas: Pfizer Director Jordon Trishton Walker Shares Concern for COVID Vaccine Effect on Women’s Reproductive Health … ‘There is Something Irregular About the Menstrual Cycles’ … ‘Affecting Something Hormonal’ – [your]NEWS

Project Veritas released a new video today featuring Pfizer Director, Jordon Trishton Walker, where he shares his concern about the COVID vaccine and its potential negative effects on women’s reproductive health.

yournews.com

 

[nomad]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• According to a December 2021 survey of 2,840 Americans, between 217,330 and 332,608 people died from the COVID jabs in 2021
• Survey results also show that people who got the jab were more likely to know someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19 infection, whereas those who knew someone who experienced a health problem after getting the jab were less likely to be jabbed
• Of the respondents, 34% knew one or more people who had experienced a significant health problem due to the COVID-19 illness, and 22% knew one or more people who had been injured by the shot
• 51% of the survey respondents had been jabbed. Of those, 13% reported experiencing a “serious” health problem post-jab. Compare that to Pfizer’s six-month safety analysis, which claimed only 1.2% of trial participants experienced a serious adverse event
• In December 2022, Rasmussen Reports polled 1,000 Americans. In this poll, 34% reported experiencing minor side effects from the jab and 7% reported major side effects

That said, the most recent survey1,2 — published in the peer-reviewed journal BMC Infectious Diseases — puts the death toll from the COVID jabs somewhere between 217,330 and 332,608 in 2021 alone. As noted by Steve Kirsch:3

"[We've] killed at least 217,000 Americans and seriously injured 33 million … in just the first year, and the CDC and FDA want to give you more shots … Since deaths from the vaccine were higher in 2022, most experts would estimate the all-cause mortality death toll from the COVID vaccines to be in the range of 500K to 600K.

So the global cost of life from these vaccines is on the order of 10 to 12 million people … These [data] are consistent with the numbers I've been saying for a long time. It's not a coincidence."

Hundreds of Thousands Killed for No Reason
Based on these survey data, Skidmore estimates:

"… the total number of fatalities due to COVID-19 inoculation may be as high as 278,000 (95% CI 217,330-332,608) when fatalities that may have occurred regardless of inoculation are removed."

Were COVID-19 an infection with an extremely high mortality rate, perhaps high rates of death from a vaccine would be acceptable. But COVID-19 has an exceptionally low mortality rate, on par with or lower than influenza, hence the risk associated with the COVID jabs ought to be equally low.

The Fallout Caused by Remdesivir

Calls for a criminal investigation into remdesivir are being initiated, as it is believed to be responsible for causing injury to Americans. See details here.

articles.mercola.com

 

[rumble phish]

My boy came down with a bug last week. COVID test was positive. He was down for about 3 days with mild symptoms. Had to stay home for 7 days. The worst part for him was the boredom. I got sick for a couple of days, also with very mild symptoms but both of my COVID tests were negative.

BTW, we've both been vaxxed, but just the once back in 2021. My wife and I tested positive once at the end of '21 and my boy has had it twice now, and both times it was a nothing burger.

 

[Stetson]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• According to a December 2021 survey of 2,840 Americans, between 217,330 and 332,608 people died from the COVID jabs in 2021

What does this even mean?

 

[nomad]

It means they asked people do you know of anyone that died. Kinda like a police investigation. Presumably they followed each lead, because the study is peer reviewed/

it SUGGESTS that the nmumber of deaths FROM the mrna drug is severl;y underrreoprted

Thats all good night

 

[Anal Disco]

It means they asked people do you know of anyone that died.....the study is peer reviewed

Polls aren't a peer reviewed study lol

 

[Stetson]

It means they asked people do you know of anyone that died. Kinda like a police investigation. Presumably they followed each lead, because the study is peer reviewed/

Do you mean to say that someone conducted a telephone survey to 2840 Americans, and each one of those 2840 respondents claimed to be personally aware of somewhere between 76.5 and 117.1 people that died from a covid vaccination? Am I misunderstanding this somehow? This sounds ridiculous.

 

[rumble phish]

It means they asked people do you know of anyone that died. Kinda like a police investigation. Presumably they followed each lead, because the study is peer reviewed/

it SUGGESTS that the nmumber of deaths FROM the mrna drug is severl;y underrreoprted

Thats all good night

You don't ever help your own cause. You know that, right?

 

[KEHALE]

The SAD is killing most of us.

Vaccines are just a bonus.

 

[nomad]

Do you mean to say that someone conducted a telephone survey to 2840 Americans, and each one of those 2840 respondents claimed to be personally aware of somewhere between 76.5 and 117.1 people that died from a covid vaccination? Am I misunderstanding this somehow? This sounds ridiculous.

I didnt read it. IM just the messenger. Its just a piece of the puizzle. Make of it what you will
dont shoot the messenger

im waiting for the bench science. until then not even the govt got better than this

 

[rumble phish]

I didnt read it. IM just the messenger. Its just a piece of the puizzle. Make of it what you will
dont shoot the messenger

im waiting for the bench science. until then not even the govt got better than this

Should we shoot the messenger if he's a blithering idiot?

 

[nomad]

Should we shoot the messenger if he's a blithering idiot?

HEY... I resemble that remark |
All messengers are blithering and idiots, dont you watch Fox News?
If you shoot them all, how ya gonna get any messages - duh

 

[nomad]

 

[nomad]

In 2021, Gates called mRNA shots "magic" and "game changers." He's also said, "Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal."4 Contrast that with his latest statements acknowledging the shots' failures. Investigative journalist Jordan Schachtel explained:5

"Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who served as one of the architects of Covid hysteria and had more of an impact than any other individual on the disastrous global pandemic policies, has finally acknowledged that the mRNA shots he's been promoting for two years are nothing more than expired pharma junk.

Translation: Gates admits that the shots are impossible to align with rapidly developing variants, they expire in lighting speed, and they don't stop transmission. And they don't work for the only at-risk portion of the population."

Gates' major reversal on the shots comes too late, however, as his prior praises were instrumental in dictating government policy, despite his massive financial conflicts of interest. Soave adds:

"For there not to be more interrogation of his conflict of interest here by the mainstream is deeply disturbing, and for people who have been skeptical of this aspect of Pfizer and the drug development around COVID and who have been shot down in the media as kooks, anti-vaxxers and the like.

I frankly think that this issue of pharmaceutical corruption and people pushing various interventions, having an investment in profit, should have been an issue that the left was leading on.

We have to be more transparent about the fact that people who are having input in what the government policy is going to be, what's going to be required people, the Biden administration tried to require people to get this, shouldn't it be known at least when there are hundreds of millions of dollars of financial interests at stake for the people advising this? And their tune changes as it follows the money!"

 

[Truth]

I didnt read it

That makes 2 of us

 

[KEHALE]

I’m just glad I have access to the fully approved FDA vaccine.

 

[OldskoolBusa]

Yup, you guessed it!
I'm happily enjoying a black elderberry tea.

 

[nomad]

Six of 10 Vaccines Studied Increase Mortality

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• The improved measles vaccine rolled out in Africa in 1989 was found to double mortality from other diseases in girls. The diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine (DTP) was found to have the same disastrous effect, doubling mortality among children under the age of 5, and girls were again more likely to die
• Inactivated (non-live) vaccines — the DTP, pentavalent vaccine, inactivated polio vaccine, H1N1 influenza vaccine and the hepatitis B vaccine — all increased all-cause mortality, especially among girls, even when they offered a high degree of protection against the target disease
• GlaxoSmithKline’s antimalarial vaccine Mosquirix, which appears to offer 18% to 36.3% protection against malaria depending on the age group, was found to increase all-cause mortality by 24%
• In Phase 3 trials, Mosquirix increased the risk of meningitis 10 fold, as well as the risk for cerebral malaria, and doubled female all-cause mortality
• According to bioethicists, the World Health Organization’s malaria vaccine study breaches international ethical standards as they are testing vaccine safety in clinical trials without first obtaining informed consent from parents of child participants in Malawi, Ghana and Kenya

‘Vaccination Opponents Are Justified in Being Concerned’
The problem is, most people never see that data, much less take the time to interpret it and, thus, the lie, through simple repetition, becomes “established fact.” As noted in the Science News DK article:

“For 40 years, Danish researchers ... have shown that vaccines against everything from polio and smallpox to malaria and tuberculosis have both beneficial and harmful health effects that are unrelated to the diseases the vaccines protect against.

Now these researchers have put the research into a historical perspective that they hope can help make the world’s health authorities realize that the relationship between vaccines and disease is not always simple.

In fact, their research shows that some vaccines protect against completely different diseases than those for which they are designed. Unfortunately, other vaccines are associated with excess mortality from unrelated diseases ...

‘What do researchers do when they discover that vaccination opponents are justified in being concerned? No vaccines have been studied for their non-specific effects on overall health, and before we have examined these, we cannot actually determine that the vaccines are safe.

In addition, our research shows that some vaccines actually increase overall mortality, especially among girls, and this is very worrying,’ explains Christine Stabell Benn, Clinical Professor, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.”

So, where are the headlines declaring the scientific conclusion that vaccination opponents are justified in their concern? As expected, the information — published in Clinical Microbiology and Infections2 — has not been well received by health authorities, including the World Health Organization. It’s been largely ignored wholesale.

Vaccines Studied Increase Mortality

Public health organizations insist vaccines are safe and effective and that the science on this 'is settled,' much of the actual data tells a different story.

articles.mercola.com

 

[nomad]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• While COVID-19 meets the technical definition of a pandemic, the death toll is nowhere near that of earlier serious pandemics that would legitimately justify the extraordinary measures being deployed by the U.S. government
• An estimated 75 million to 200 million people in Eurasia and as much as 60% of the European population in rural areas were wiped out by the Black Death (bubonic plague) between 1347 and 1351
• The Spanish flu (swine flu), which hit during World War I in 1918, infected 500 million people worldwide, killing an estimated 50 million, or 2.7% of the global population
• Using the higher of two prominent COVID-19 trackers, 238,950 people had died, globally, from COVID-19 as of the afternoon on May 2, 2020. Based on a global population of 7.8 billion, 238,950 deaths amount to 0.003% of the global population
• Mid-March predictions said COVID-19 would kill 2.2 million Americans if allowed to run its course. April 8, 2020, the Murray Model downgraded the threat to 60,000 dead by August, which is lower than the death toll for the seasonal flu of 2017/2018

 

[nomad]

Specifically, PACE concluded there was “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO,” and that the drug industry had influenced the organization’s decision-making.20 As reported by the Natural Society in 2014:21

“... a joint investigation by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) has uncovered some serious conflicts of interest between the World Health Organization (WHO), who proposed ... heavy vaccinations, and the pharmaceutical companies which created them.

The joint-investigation’s report explains that the WHO profited immensely22 from the scare tactics they utilized to promote the use of a swine flu vaccine.

Creating mass hysteria was the WHO’s emergency advisory committee’s goal ... The WHO told the world that up to 7 million people could die without the vaccines they were pushing ... The advisory panel was choked with individuals highly connected to the pharmaceutical companies with vested interests in both antiviral and influenza vaccines.

An over $4 billion stake was invested in developing these vaccines, and without a pandemic there would be no use for them. Utilizing propaganda and fear, the drugs were pushed on unsuspecting people, and the money was made.”

Disturbingly, while the WHO was found to have had serious conflicts of interest with the drug industry, nothing has actually changed since then, which makes one wonder whether the WHO’s COVID-19 pandemic response can actually be trusted.

 

[nomad]

According to Dr. Michael Hattwick, who directed the surveillance team for the 1976 swine flu vaccination program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there was evidence showing influenza vaccinations could, and had, caused neurological complications in the past.
He claims he warned his superiors of this possibility, as it pertained to the swine flu campaign. Yet the CDC denied the evidence and the American public was never informed of this risk. 60 Minutes also reveals the CDC was proven to have lied in its marketing materials for the vaccine.
Judy Roberts was one of the victims of that campaign. She was paralyzed by the vaccine, and suffered permanent damage. Her husband, who was also vaccinated and suffered no ill effects, ends the segment saying:

“I told Judy to take the shot ... I’m mad with my government. They knew the facts but they didn’t release those facts, because if they had released them, people wouldn’t have taken it.

And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there’s going to be an epidemic, and they can drop off like flies next to me, and I will not take another shot that my government tells me to take.”

Sudden Death Among Adults Now in the News

Former BlackRock fund manager Edward Dowd is bringing attention to the surge in deaths and disability that has recently occurred.

articles.mercola.com

 

[sailUSVI]

Move over Nomad and let me elbow my way in here….
Booster Shots May Trigger Stroke Incidents, According to CDC and FDA
In addition to cardiac events, another life-threatening side effect has been associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. When is the risk period? Does the flu shot play any role in these events? What actions should we take to better protect ourselves?
Summary of Key Facts

• An increased risk of stroke events has been identified with the Pfizer COVID-19 bivalent vaccine, according to a joint statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
• The onset time in people aged 65 years and older was 1–21 days after the booster, with a significant cluster of events observed 11–21 days after the booster.
• Sixty-four percent had received the flu vaccine on the same day as the COVID-19 booster.
• The bivalent booster contains the code of the spike protein, contributing to the increased risk of blood clots. High-risk people should avoid the boosters.
• Solution: Remember the five “suddens” of stroke warning signs.
• Advice on preventing other risk factors of stroke is also provided in this paper.

On Jan. 13, 2023, the FDA and CDC issued a joint statement that a new “safety signal” for ischemic stroke had been detected in one of the agency’s vaccine safety surveillance systems.

 

[nomad]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• The U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
• The program was implemented April 1, 2022, and adopted by most medical clinics and hospitals across the U.S. until January 2023
• Under this program, doctors at clinics and hospitals have been instructed to ask patients about their vaccination status, which is then added to their electronic medical records as a diagnostic code, known as ICD-10 code, so that they can be tracked inside and outside of the medical system
• These new ICD-10 codes are part of the government’s plan to implement medical tyranny using vaccine passports and digital IDs
• They’re also tracking noncompliance with all other recommended vaccines using new ICD-10 codes, and have implemented codes to describe WHY you didn’t get a recommended vaccine. They’ve also added a billable ICD code for “vaccine safety counseling”

Below is a screenshot of page 194 of the agenda4 distributed during that meeting. According to the NCHS, "there is interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized," and they figured out a way to do just that, by adding new ICD-10 codes.
As you can see below, ICD-10 code Z28.310 identifies those who have not received a COVID jab and Z28.311 identifies those who are not up-to-date on their shots.

 

[nomad]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Dr. Anthony Fauci stepped down from his position as director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in December 2022
• Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, is a likely replacement
• Hotez’s career has been largely devoted to developing drugs to test on “underdeveloped and hyper-exploited countries in Latin America, South Asia and Africa,” while much of Hotez’s success can be traced back to Fauci, Bill Gates and Bill Clinton
• Hotez was instrumental in propelling “neglected tropical diseases” into a key initiative that needed to be addressed with drugs and vaccines, instead of addressing sanitation
• Hotez has suggested “anti-science” agendas be punished as hate crimes and the U.S. government should censor “anti-science terrorist groups” such as vaccine safety advocates

 

[Anal Disco]

 

[nomad]

HEY NATHAN ANDERSON, MD - probably best to stick to being a doctor cos you clearly suck at comprehending anything wider than your specialty.

Ya see in the big bad wide world that is COPORATE DOMINANCE OF POLITCAL PROCESS in the so called free world, DRUG INDUSTRY DICTATES POLICY and right now, they want to send big bad messages like this to get the desired uptake of their products and that new lear jet all the execs got their eye on.

It is more than unfortunate that good people llike you are so easly browbeaten and influenced to believe that corona virus vaccination is anything other than modern day snake oil, with hidden and covered up side effects that are more dangerous than a loaded shotgun.

 

[OldskoolBusa]

Prior COVID infection provides just as much protection as vaccines, new study finds

A new study found that previous COVID-19 infection offers at least the same level of protection as two doses of vaccines, lasting for 40 weeks or longer.

www.foxnews.com

 

[nomad]

Prior COVID infection provides just as much protection as vaccines, new study finds

A new study found that previous COVID-19 infection offers at least the same level of protection as two doses of vaccines, lasting for 40 weeks or longer.

www.foxnews.com

A new study found that a previous COVID-19 infection offers at least the same level of protection as two doses of high-quality mRNA vaccines, such as Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech.
Additionally, people who are infected with the virus may be protected from reinfection for 40 weeks or longer, the study found.


"high quaility" vaccine ---- rofl


This result is intuitively obvious
Its how natural immunity works

 

[Rhino]

A new study found that a previous COVID-19 infection offers at least the same level of protection as two doses of high-quality mRNA vaccines, such as Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech.
Additionally, people who are infected with the virus may be protected from reinfection for 40 weeks or longer, the study found.


"high quaility" vaccine ---- rofl


This result is intuitively obvious
Its how natural immunity works

Not true...


Had it in early December of 21 about three weeks. and then again in late January of 22 for 8 weeks and still have side effects.

 

[BusaVeloce]

In her first major public step toward her promise to reform the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Director Rochelle Walensky has chosen Maine CDC Director Nirav Shah to serve as her second-in-command. As her “principal” deputy, he’ll be focusing primarily on communication issues for the agency. It is a remarkable decision, as Shah’s background demonstrates a staggering inability to effectively manage or communicate in the field of public health.

Following his election as Governor of Illinois in 2014, Bruce Rauner nominated Shah to serve as the director of the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). His nomination papers listed only two jobs in his career, one as an attorney, the other as an economist. Plus a fellowship with the Soros Foundation. He held no medical license, was not a practicing physician, and his name does not appear as a contributor on any scholarly study. Perhaps most significant, Shah had never managed an organization that rivaled the size and complexity of a government agency. Barely six months into his new role, his lack of qualifications became apparent in deadly ways.

The Truth About Nirav Shah The Maine Media Never Told You - The Maine Wire

In her first major public step toward her promise to reform the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Director Rochelle Walensky has chosen Maine CDC Director Nirav Shah to serve as her second-in-command. As her “principal” deputy, he’ll be focusing primarily on communication issues...

www.themainewire.com

 

[rumble phish]

Following his election as Governor of Illinois in 2014, Bruce Rauner nominated Shah to serve as the director of the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). His nomination papers listed only two jobs in his career, one as an attorney, the other as an economist. Plus a fellowship with the Soros Foundation. He held no medical license, was not a practicing physician, and his name does not appear as a contributor on any scholarly study. Perhaps most significant, Shah had never managed an organization that rivaled the size and complexity of a government agency. Barely six months into his new role, his lack of qualifications became apparent in deadly ways.

The Truth About Nirav Shah The Maine Media Never Told You - The Maine Wire

In her first major public step toward her promise to reform the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Director Rochelle Walensky has chosen Maine CDC Director Nirav Shah to serve as her second-in-command. As her “principal” deputy, he’ll be focusing primarily on communication issues...

www.themainewire.com

And there's your answer in bold, enlarged font.

 

[Qwik]

Since its just me with zero relatives/family at this point, I don't care. I refuse to pay tens of thousands of dollars to dispose of my carcass, and I don't want anyone else I know to pay for that, either. Let me remain unclaimed and let the hospital/county/state deal with it. [Edit: I am an organ donor, part me out].

If friends want to gather and have a drink or eat sushi or tacos in memorial, that's fine. I'll have left an envelope with the some cash to fund that.

Fuck You Jim. I will gladly kick in for services for you.

 

[rumble phish]

I think I want to be planted. Seriously. There's a company that will put your corpse in a biodegradable compost bag, along with a sapling. They "plant" you and your decaying carcass nourishes the tree.

 

[gobrian77]

I think I want to be planted. Seriously. There's a company that will put your corpse in a biodegradable compost bag, along with a sapling. They "plant" you and your decaying carcass nourishes the tree.

If you think you're gonna croak anytime soon (like before the beginning of the next outdoor grow season), leave instructions to have your remains shipped over here, and I'll use you to nourish a new cannabis strain- I won't even change the name from your labs handle. I can get a large compost bag no problem.

 

[Qwik]

I think I want to be planted. Seriously. There's a company that will put your corpse in a biodegradable compost bag, along with a sapling. They "plant" you and your decaying carcass nourishes the tree.

Yep, I want mine to be an almond tree. So people can eat my nuts

 

[Anal Disco]

Cremate me and flush me down the toilet.

 

[hagrid]

You are getting taxidermied and installed in the rape shed with a replaceable fleshlight where your mouth and buckeye are located.